Ryuki Matsuda vs Hayden Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the last six months, Ryuki Matsuda has won 45.79% of points on their second serve, slightly outperforming Hayden Jones, who has won 45.25%.
• Regarding return games, Hayden Jones excels in winning opponent's second serve points with 46.16% compared to Ryuki Matsuda's 44.85%. However, Matsuda is more effective against first serves with a success rate of 29.93% versus Jones's 28.71%.
• Under pressure, Matsuda saves 53.52% of breakpoints, marginally better than Jones's 52.36% success rate.
• In the past year, Matsuda holds a winning percentage of 46.77% in matches, while Jones has a 39.53% success rate, indicating a slight edge for Matsuda in overall match outcomes.
• The surface analysis reveals Matsuda's strongest performance is on hard courts with a 57% win rate, contrasting Jones who excels on grass, also with a 57% win rate, but struggles on clay with a 0% win percentage.
• Focusing on match level, Matsuda has predominantly played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.61% of these matches, while Jones has secured victories in 48.28% of similar-level matches.
• Considering opponent quality, Matsuda has faced players with an average rank of 446.95, slightly lower than the 431.72-ranking of Jones’s opponents, potentially indicating a tougher competition for Jones.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Matsuda's past performance shows a 50% success rate, advantageous over Jones’s 41% success rate.
• Analyzing break point conversion, Jones demonstrates superior skill, converting 40.63% compared to Matsuda’s 32.02%, a noteworthy factor during critical points in the match.

Editorial Prediction (November 24, 2025, UTC):

As we evaluate the upcoming match between Ryuki Matsuda and Hayden Jones, several factors indicate subtle advantages for each player. Matsuda marginally leads in overall match performance and executes well under pressure, saving breakpoints with a slightly higher success rate compared to Jones. However, Jones’s ability to convert break point opportunities poses a potentially critical advantage during intense match phases.

In terms of surfaces, their performances are relatively equal, but it is essential to consider that neither excels significantly on the anticipated surface for this event. Considering the level of competition each has faced, Jones has encountered more challenging opponents, which might have sharpened his competitive edges.

Ultimately, while both players present areas of strength, Ryuki Matsuda seems more likely to emerge victorious due to his consistent performance statistics and slightly superior results under pressure. It will, however, be crucial for him to maintain focus, especially when faced with break points.